The iBasso DX160 is a new mid-range compact media player featuring Android Oreo, a 1080p screen, balanced output, and a dual CS 43198 DAC. It is priced at $399.

Disclaimer: The iBasso DX160 was sent to us as a sample in exchange for our honest opinion. We thank iBasso for this opportunity. 

To learn more about iBasso products reviewed on Headfonics you can click here.

Slide here to add your score on the gear!276 Votes
9
9
Score
$399

For those of you who read our initial First Contact feature a few weeks ago, you may find a degree of overlap on the first page. Feel free to skip to pages 2-3 for our in-depth look at the performance of the DX160 in terms of software, sound, and comparisons. For newcomers to the DX160, kindly read on!

This is our third, and final mid-fi DAP for review for 2019. The DX160 comes hot on the heels of the HiBy R5 and FiiO’s M11 (including the higher-priced Pro version). Like the HiBy R5, the DX160 is priced at just $399 and for what it offers I would term it as a bit of a bargain and we will tell you why we think that throughout this review.

Trickle Down

The DX160, like it’s two competitors, is a huge leap forward in terms of what can be done at this price-point from what we saw even just 18 months ago.  Whilst the DX160 no longer adheres to iBasso’s very mature and excellent amp card eco-system, it does bring forward a much smaller form factor. It also ushers in some trickle-down features of their excellent DX220 such as the quality of the screen and a more refined Oreo experience.

For a large portion of audiophiles, these new mid-fi DAPs are compelling arguments on negating the need to stretch the budget to true high-end devices. I for one, am very happy about that.

iBasso DX160

Tech Inside

1080P Screen

So, the trickle-down feature set from the DX220 is excellent. Not only do we have a smaller 5″ version of that beautiful 1080P multi-touch capable screen but we now have an ability to switch it from 1080P to 720P for battery life and performance which is on par with the latest DX220 firmware recently released.

Dual DAC

We also have a dual DAC setup using 2 Cirrus Logic CS43198’s which if you have read our HiBy R5 review you will know these are the same chips used inside their similarly priced DAP. Of course, chips are not everything and to that end, iBasso has thrown in a very powerful but fixed amp stage capable of up to 6.4Vrms balanced and 3.2Vrms unbalanced. We get 4.4mm and 3.5mm outputs but no 2.5mm TRRS like the slightly more expensive FiiO M11.

Oreo Out Of The Box

Android Oreo 8.1 is installed out of the box which is consistent now with the rest of the DX series of DAPs and matched only by HiBy and their R5 at the same price. The M11 still comes with Android 7. Like the M11, however, the DX160 does not come with Google Play installed. Instead, you get two 3rd party app services, Cool APK and APK Pure which do a nice job of getting around the regional locks Google has but does not have the same level of apps support as Google.

Native MQA Decoding

The final key feature to highlight in our First Contact is native MQA out of the box which no other DAP at this price point has. Granted, the R% native MQA is on the way and should be getting a firmware update pretty soon but if you are impatient, then the DX160 is the choice as of today.

iBasso DX160

Design

The DX160 is not the smallest in its class, but it sure is the prettiest. The 5″ 1080P screen dominates with a virtually borderless design that will appeal to modern smartphone users a lot. Borderless means even though it is a fairly large screen it does not translate into a large DAP.

This version comes in black but I am sure you have seen a few of the ads around of late that show that the DX160 will come in a wide range of colors including red, blue and silver. I prefer black as it really enhances that borderless screen effect.

This design is more than just a big screen. The fixed amp stage allows iBasso to thin out the form factor measurably. With the older Amp card designs, the DX150 had to be on the fat side to accommodate and side by side the DX160 is tiny, svelte and very pocketable.

iBasso DX160

The CNC machined aluminum chassis curving is also very comfortable in the hand. The comfort level is aided with a relatively light 170g weight. That is slightly heavier than the 160g HiBy R5 but much lighter than the 211g of the FiiO M11. The rear is tempered glass similar to the HiBy R5 and I presume a more porous material for the internal antenna signal to get through.

It does follow some of the DX220 legacy design with a low-profile volume dial though this time it is gold on black instead of silver on grey. The three playback control buttons on the same right panel remain giving it that quasi-Sony look to the design.

iBasso DX160

I/O

The base panel has the 4.4mm and 3.5mm balanced and unbalanced outputs in matching gold-plated sockets and a single microSD open slot on the left panel. The 3.5mm output also doubles for a lineout and SPDIF coaxial output duties. Both of these output jacks have nice and low impedance ratings at 0.4Ω for balanced and 0.3Ω unbalance.

The power button and USB-C port, like the DX150/200/220, are on the top panel of the DX160 which is fairly consistent for an iBasso DAP.

iBasso DX160

Screen

In a word, tasty. This is a 5″ 1080P capable multi-touch IPS screen capable of 16.7 million colors and a 445PPI retina fine display. The screen dominates the design of the DX160, perhaps more so than the HiBy R3 which I always felt was a perfect example of screen orientated design. It is practically borderless, must more so than any other DAP at this price point.

For sure this is one of the trickle-down high impact features first seen on the flagship DX220 because it feels like it is the exact same screen. The viewing angle is just as good with an almost 180-degree or flat viewing capability and excellent general use legibility.

Switchable Resolution

For those that are concerned that 1080p will sap the battery on the DX160, you can now adjust the resolution down to 720p that will be gentler on the battery. This was also a recent firmware update on the DX220 and makes sense if you use it primarily as a music player.

The slightly larger 5″ size also means the OS is not so fiddly for large fingers, the one criticism I have of the R5 screen implementation. Sure, the R5 is smaller as a device but for Android that is not always a positive factor.

Controls

The control experience on the DX160 is more or less the same as competing DAPs. The DAP can be controlled in 3 different ways; touch, physical and remote.

Touch

Despite the reduced memory capacity of the DX160 from 4GB, (DX220) to 2GB, the touch controls are responsive and just slightly slower than the R5 which I expected given the slightly better CPU in the R5. We did a side by side test booting up HiBy’s Music app and on each occasion, the R5 process was marginally quicker.

The overall performance of the touch experience though was competitive and faster than the DX150. Lag felt minimal and pinch and zoom multi-touch features felt suitable responsive where applicable.

Aside from that, the touchscreen will do everything you need the DX160 to do outside of initiating volume control, power on/off and LCD on/off. You can however increase or decrease volume control via the touchscreen multi-touch control once initiated via the physical dial. Unlike the PAW Gold Touch, you cannot double-tap from the screen off option so you have to do that one via the power button to the right side.

iBasso DX160

Physical

More akin to the FiiO M11 than the R5, the DX160 uses a mix of dial and physical buttons on a single panel. The R5 splits duties on both panels with two volume buttons on the left and the playback on the right with power.

The DX160 prefers the FiiO method with a rotary volume dial plus playback buttons all on a single panel, (right side). Power/LCD control button is housed on the top panel which is the norm for iBasso. You can also customize or lock your controls on the left pane via Android which is common for Oreo DAP players.

iBasso DX160

The only color commentary I noted about the DX160 physical button and dial configuration is just how flush or tight they are to the main housing. Out of the silicone case, it is not much of an issue. However, once you put the silicone case on the volume dial is hard to access and it takes very little pressure on the power button for it to be activated. You definitely need two fingers to really move the volume dial which is awkward.

iBasso DX160

Wireless

The DX160 will operate as both a transmitter and a receiver and connect to multiple wireless devices using Bluetooth 5.0. You can also access some app control features though this will largely depend on the apps you are using.

I found it relatively easy to connect my Samsung Note 9 to the DX160 and by simply switching on the ‘Bluetooth DAC+AMP Mode’ in the Bluetooth menu after doing the initial BT pairing process. I was able to automatically stream audio from the Note 9 to the DX160 using any music app. That also included streaming apps such as TIDAL which sound excellent on the DX160 via the Note 9 BT connection.

Because BT5.0 allows Bi-Directional support you can also flip the audio experience and stream your audio from the DX220 to a receiver of your choice such as a smartphone or another DAP since it is backward compatible with BT4.2. I had no issues streaming from the DX160 to the R2R200 Black, for example, or any Bluetooth active wireless speaker within range.

iBasso DX160

Memory

Internal

The DX160 comes with 32GB of onboard memory and a single microSD slot on the left panel. At this price point, this actually a step up on the 16GB offered by HiBy on their R5 and on par with the more expensive M11.

There is a caveat and that is the size of the system install for Oreo which always reduces the available onboard memory for files. In this case, it is around 8Gb leaving about 24GB free which is not great but considering the R5 is about 9GB free it is somewhat better. Like the R5, I recommend keeping the internal memory for apps installs only and using the external slot for music storage.

External

The external memory slot on the left panel is an open tray much like the DX220 design. There is no official capacity limit listed for the cards so I am presuming you can max this out though I stick with 64GB cards for cost purposes.

You can, of course, expand via the R5’s USB-C OTG capability with any size powered HDD or flash drive really. Our 64GB SanDisk drive worked perfectly fine for tracks loading and HiBy Music will scan it and integrate it right into your main library for ease of management.

iBasso DX160

Battery Life

The DX160 uses a 3200mAh Lithium-ion polymer battery which is a bit smaller than the 4400mAh 3.8V Li-Polymer inside the DX220. However, the rated playback time of 13 hours is better on paper than the 8-10 hours of the DX220/AMP 1 MKII.

Again, we do have to throw a caveat in there because iBasso has not made a distinction between balanced and unbalanced battery life. They have instead gone for an average rating which I presume is industry-standard testing of MP3 tracks with the LCD screen and wireless turned off.

Of course, it is also difficult to tell how accurate the numbers are on a daily basis since the Android platform is user-specific and your own usage pattern will dictate final numbers.

As a test, I burned through around 25% in a 3-hour window from 47% to 21% doing some regular tasks. This included using Bluetooth, loading about 20GB of music unbalanced on a 20Ω load and playing around 30-45 mins. The rest was LCD on no use or standby. Based on that performance I can expect 10-12 hours unbalanced and below 10 hours for balanced.

Charging

Charging is interesting with the DX160. Like the DX220 you have fast charge options with Quick Charge 3, and PD2.0 but no MTK PE Plus. That awfully long charge 3-4 hours charge time of the DX150 is now cut down to just under 2.5 hours for a complete cycle and about 1.5 hours for up to 70%.

The interesting thing is that my laptop USB3.0 will not charge it. It holds it steady so that 0.5A is not adequate to charge. I have no issues with the M11 and R5 using the same port.

iBasso DX160

Packaging

iBasso tends to have a fairly set packaging scheme for its mid-range products right down to the IT01. The DX160 falls into this scheme with a fairly compact silvery-blue vinyl sleeved flip-lid retail box similar to the IT04 and IT01s. It is not as fancy as the angular DX220 slider case but then something has to give to get it down to $399.

Inside you get a small envelope stuck to the lid of the box with some warranty and manual leaflets plus an MQA card just to remind you that the DAP can do MQA out of the box. The DX160 is fairly well protected with a peel-off black label on the front which you take off before applying any screen protectors.

iBasso DX160

Accessories

The accessories can be found underneath and it is functional without being overly elaborate. You get a silicone case instead of a leather case this time, 2 screen protectors and a very nice 1m nylon jacketed USB-C to USB-A cable for charging and data. The silicone case is pretty tight actually and with a nice cut to it so it does not add too much bulk to the DX160 form factor.

 Click On Page 2 below for Hardware & Software Performance

  • 285
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    286
    Shares

46 Responses

    • Indrajit

      Hi. I use the X5iii(line out) via a Magni 3 amp+hd598 headphone. Following the above configuHiration(line out+amp) does the X5iii then have a sound quality as good as Ibasso DX160?

      Reply
      • Marcus

        The main coloration will come from your amp but you will notice the performance upgrade on the DX160 over the X5iii with a superior line out voltage output so it sounds more dynamic and punchy.

  1. gtj

    Hi Marcus.
    Any chance you have a pure sound quality comparison with the BTR5?
    I know one is a DAP and the other a BT receiver but judging by your review, the sound signature might not be far off between these 2.

    Many thanks!

    Reply
      • gtj

        May I also ask if you had a chance to compare with any of the ZX2 or ZX507?

      • Marcus

        Dang no sorry, Sony samples are non-existent and the Zx2 I have not heard in years.

      • gtj

        No problem Marcus. Your review is by far the most informative and complete for this player. I will hopefully have a chance to try it soon. Keep up the great work.

  2. Felipe

    Buenas me gusta leer para aprender…tengo unos sennheiser momentum 3 cual me recomendarias.gracias

    Reply
  3. Marc

    A bit vague but what may I expect SQ wise coming from the DX90 or the iFi Micro iDSD (OG)? I use the Sony IER-M7 for reference!

    Reply
    • Marcus

      A more refined timbre, that means a wetter treble and not as dry but still very nicely extended. Also much better staging. That’s going on memory of the DX90 and not actual side to side.

      Reply
  4. Alfred

    Hi Marcus!

    As I almost decided to get the hiby r5 because of the power you’ve said, this ibasso dx160 caught my eye because of the sound sig which I prefer the more neutral and complex.

    My only question is this, will the ibasso dx160 sound better or will deliver the power on the he 4xx or still the hiby r5? Thanks for the help. I like this site for the audiophile reviews. More power!

    Reply
    • Marcus

      Actually, if you check the final page of this review there should be a comparison with the R5. Now I do not have a 4xx but the R5 performs better on low impedance and the DX160 on higher loads around 150-300 ohms. I think the 4xx, being planar, is low ohm and therefore the R5.

      Reply
      • Alfred

        Yes I saw it in the last page. Well it’s just ibasso looks and sounds better overall but to power this planar is important for me so I go with the r5 instead. Thanks Marcus!

      • Don

        I have both, and they’re almost identical sound wise. But the dx160 has a serious wifi connectivity issue. If you’re a streamer, buy the r5. Once I walk out of the room with my router, the ibasso drops the wifi so I cannot stream. All my other players, laptops, tablets, smartphones have no issue. Even my fiio M6 that costs 129.00 streams from anywear in my hone(2400 Sq ft).

    • Marcus

      Its load handling is better weighted to 150 and 300 though to be honest if you want good handling for 300 ohm I always pick a desktop solution.

      Reply
      • Sid

        Thanks a lot for the reply Marcus. I am going to pair it with My Fiio F9 pro, M50x and HD598.
        How much of a difference will it make when I compare it with my existing setup Of iPhone XR+Fiio Q1MKII VS iBasso DX160?

      • Mohammad

        Is it on par with Ibasso DX90 if we only consider sound quality?

  5. Jim

    Hey! Great review. Which IEM in a price range from 300-450 would you recommend as best pairing with DX160 ?

    Reply
      • Marcus

        Ohhh haha, ok ok, Cayin YB04, FiiO Fh7, FiiO Fh5, DUNU DK-3001 Pro – preference is a thing though so read the reviews before picking. Thanks!

  6. Simon

    How come that all recent ratings of different products (IEMs, DAPs, Amps etc,..) had a major score drop? Not long ago some products had much higher scores after you published reviews, and those scores are much lower now…

    Reply
    • Marcus

      A couple of reasons.

      The first is we introduced a new scoring system for 2020. You can read more about it here – https://headfonics.com/how-we-score/

      Second, all previous editorial scores up until Jan 2020 are gone, instead, we have readers vote only. Those scores vary depending on what the reader votes on. You are welcome to vote also.

      Editorial review scores from us apply to the calendar year only and will be applied to the awards at the end of the year. Readers can vote at the same time on 2020 reviews and we have 2 scores – us and you guys. Once we hit 2021 we reset for another year and leave the readers votes to stand for 2020, just as we have done for 2019.

      Finally, readers can now submit their own reviews below in the comments section. Readers can score just like us and that will have an effect on the final readers’ score.

      Hope that helps.

      Reply
  7. richard

    Hi Marcus,
    In the sound quality department, since you have listened to the Dethonray DTR1, which one do you think is better ?

    Thanks a lot

    Reply
    • Marcus

      Oh, good question, one I will address in the DTR1 full review coming soon. I am pulling from aural memory but the DTR1 might be the better with headphones.

      Reply
  8. Shahram

    Do you prefer the Ibasso DX160 over the Hiby R6 Pro? In terms if Sound Quality or user experience?

    If I could get both for the same price is the R6 Pro a no brainer? I see that the Ibasso has a lower noise floor, but the R6 Pro has more power (which I don’t really need).

    Thanks!
    Shahram

    Reply
    • Marcus

      No issues there, enough power and a clean sound signature. Anything for personal preference can be tweaked in the PMEQ.

      Reply
  9. Ali

    Thanks for the review.
    I’m using Campfire Solaris and Hifiman Edition X V2 with DX150/AMP7 at the moment. I’m concerned about the EMI noise when using with Solaris. Does the 4.4mm output completely eliminate this noise? And if so the level of background hiss from the balanced output is comparable to DX150 SE or higher?

    Reply
    • Marcus

      The EMI is not ever-present and more related to unbalanced or 3.5mm than 4.4mm when it does happen so it should be fine.

      As per page 3 under Matchability:

      “Efficiency
      Outside of the EMI issue outlined below the DX160 is a very quiet DAP and marginally lower on hiss than even the HiBy R5 with sensitive IEMs. I am impressed, much more so when you compare how hissy the M11 can be with the likes of Solaris, Andromeda, and Hum’s Pristine. The DX160 is also quieter than the DX150 before it and on par with the DX220 with AMP1 MK II.”

      Reply
      • Ali

        Ok thanks.
        Which one of these sources would you consider the best with Solaris?
        xDSD – Q5s – DX160
        (not apples to apples I know)

  10. Michael S

    what do you recommend , ibasso dx160 or sony nw zx300??
    actually i am not using any streaming music services , if only lead into sound quality which one is better??

    Reply
    • Marcus

      Sorry I have not heard the ZX300 to make any definitive conclusion as to which is better based on pure sound quality.

      Reply
  11. Martin Leschinski

    this was the review I waited for – thank you
    the R5 is on it´s way and now have to get the 160 for my own comparison

    Reply
  12. Martin

    Thanks for pointing out that those poweroutput specs of iBasso are just marketing-blabla. I had the DX220 and DX200 and both of them were not able to drive Cans like an HE1000 with dynamic music material (Nik Bärtschs Ronin). The Volume was always maxed out and had me still longing for more volume. The Fiio M11 on the other hand performed like the DX220 (eventough the power output rating would tell you a different story) and is pretty honest about its own power output. So don’t expect the DX160 to have more power for harder to drive headphones. That is not a strong suite of those DAPs.

    Reply
    • Marcus

      It is a tricky one to really put a finger on accurately as most of the DAP firms never put up like for like. It took me some time to get to the core answer.

      Reply
  13. Michael

    Nice review! Speaking of sound, how would you compare DX160 and DX150 with AMP7/8?

    Reply
    • Marcus

      Never actually tried a comparison with the DX150/AMP8 as its stuck on the dx220 most of the time. Will try it for sure but it might be a while before I get around to it sadly – busy season :)

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Tonality
Build Quality
Functionality
Software
Matchability
Final Score

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.