Matchability

Efficiency

It is commendable that a flagship planar headphone these days can actually sound reasonable off modest amping both portable and desktop and the Ether C Flow is no different in that respect.  It is not yet at the level of the Hifiman Edition X V2 for pure portable drivability but it is not as muted as the LCD-2 or first gen Hifiman HE series.

Perhaps there is a factor in the increasing quality of amping stages in DAPs these days but even the budget Sony A35 got decent volume before it hit the top of its output and started clipping though the dynamics were way off what I would call ideal.

More powerful DAPs such as the balanced outputs of the AM3 module of the X7 and Cayin’s N5 also gave a suitable bump in the dynamics and resolution of the Ether C Flow but it is not until you throw in some portable or desktop dedicated amping that I found the Ether C Flow to really start to offer its true potential.

Tonal Pairings

Portable Amps

Bakoon HPA-01M

Natural to neutral amps such as the current mode Bakoon HPA-01M are an excellent match for the Flow C. The HPA-01M is built for planars with a current mode output negating the output impedance matching that you normally have with regular voltage output amps. You get a speedy, neutral and detailed presentation with excellent dynamics though the bass weight is tailed off ever so slightly.

Some people might enjoy that, it is kind of a midway path between the old Ether C flatness and the more u-shaped elevated curve of the Flow. If you want to get a touch of warmth and enhanced bass response the voltage output from the HPA-01m will deliver that but I think it sacrifices a little in the way of speed which is one of the Flow’s stronger attributes.

Cypher Labs Duet

If you want something a bit more natural sounding, perhaps even a touch darker, then the Cypher Labs Duet is an excellent pick. It’s been knocking around for a while now but it’s still a quality amp and in balanced mode, you have plenty of power for the Ether C Flow to perform. More than that tonally they both match each other core strengths perfectly. The Duet has a bias to getting the best out of the low end and lower midrange which is exactly where the C Flow has been fine tuned.

This is also a super smooth pairing on the top end, accurate vocals with an excellent sense of space and a low end that feels weighted but quick. Even with an old-school Solo plus iPod Classic it sounded very fresh from EDM to hard rock. Throw in something like Die So Fluid’s Crime Scene and the pairing has no issues at all churning out well-defined bass guitar breaks and a very powerful rhythm guitar performance.

Desktops

Solid State

Tonally I do like a more neutral system setup with the Ether C Flow as opposed to the slightly more organic and mellow tube setups I found myself gravitating to with the original Ether C. The Flow is definitely less picky when it comes to matching for its treble response so amps I tended to avoid, especially with Sabre DACs in the system setup suddenly become quite enjoyable. Neutral setups such as the balanced output of the Mjolnir and Gungnir from Schiit gave a nice clean and dynamic response with plenty of snap in the low-end delivery.

Tubes

If you want to drop it down the aggression a notch and give the Ether C Flow as slightly richer and more liquid presentation I can highly recommend the ALO Audio Continental Dual Mono DAC and either the Stereo 6 tube amp with some Brimar 6v6 tubes.

Previously I would have EQ’ed a Sabre DAC supplying a tube amp with the Ether C just to make sure the neutral Sabre top end didn’t push the peaky aspects of the Ether C too far but with the Flow it ceases to be an issue. The treble response is a lot smoother even with an analytical source in the system.

dsc02566

Select Comparisons

AKG K872

Form Factor

At $1499, AKG’s dynamic closed flagship headphone warrants serious consideration when comparing with the Ether C Flow. It is built very well, got some premium materials in there and a cleverly designed pad that is much lighter than the plush Ether pads but seals just as good. They also weigh pretty much the same and have very similar headband control systems even if they look aesthetically quite different. Of course, they are also $200 cheaper but on par price wise with the Ether C.

Cables

The one big edge the C Flow has in terms of design are the detachable cable designs and the ability to go balanced if needed with the DUM connection options. At 36 ohms the K872 may not really need to go balanced but it would have been nice to have seen that option in the cable design. The C Flow’s planar design and competitive efficiency also means it can scale pretty good in unbalanced and balanced mode so put that one in the C Flow tick list.

Tonality

Both are to my ears more musical sounding than the Ether C but the K872 and a touch brighter sounding in comparison to the C Flow’s more powerful presentation.  Bass weight and body on the K872 are more substantive than the Ether C with a bit more sub-bass presence but lacks the authority of the C Flow, particularly in the mid-bass performance and the lower midrange body.

I do have a slight personal preference for the K872 vocal staging over the Ether C Flow but I prefer the tonal quality of the C Flow vocals. The K872 vocals have a bit more presence and space afforded to them by the leaner lower midrange and linear bass performance. In much the same vein as the original Ether C vs K872 review though I do prefer the Flow vocals for brighter sources whereas the K872 could at times slip in a bit more sibilance than the Ether C. The vocals on the C Flow seem less prone to sibilance and a little smoother sounding than the K872.

Treble performance on the K872 is a touch thinner and more brittle sounding than the C Flow which in turn is smoother in the lower to mid treble with the better body. I think both are substantial improvements on the original open K812 and the Ether C though, both seem to have corrected the original problems without sacrificing on detail and articulation. On lighter airy tracks that require something a bit more ethereal I think the K872 is the business but when I need the additional power and gravitas the C Flow is more adept.

Audeze LCD-XC

Tonality

In price terms, it is still the closest match but with the advent of the C Flow, the MrSpeakers creation is putting a bit more clear light between the two than before. The C Flow is still the more neutral of the two but the gap between both in terms of low-end body, (and slam), is now much closer than before and there is that speed edge which I give to the C Flow. I still prefer the imaging of the C Flow over the XC (this is the version before the recent retune by Audeze by the way), it has a bit more space and resolution overall and the better treble energy and articulation.

Form Factor

Weight and comfort once again are with the Ether C Flow at 394g compared to the XC at a comparatively huge 650g. The LCD-XC might win the pretty stakes but the comfort stakes go to the C Flow. The seal is about even though on both units as they sport some lush and very comfortable leather pads.

Mitchell & Johnson MJ2 (Electret)

This little electret supraaural headphone is a very interesting concept and we will be putting out a review in the new year. It is closed, its woody and it delivers a very fast, speedy and detailed presentation that is fairly neutral. In some ways, it is the complete opposite of the Ether C with a shallower soundstage and a perceptibly leaner bass body.

If you are moving away from the Ether C looking for more power the MJ2 is not the headphone for you. It projects sound closer to the way an electrostatic headphone does which is fast, detailed but polite and lacking in sense of oomph (read power).

With the M2J you get a more mid-centric focus and a smaller stage to go with it so it is not quite at Stax level and more in keeping with the Koss ESP950 sound only more neutral. For me, this works wonderfully for acoustics and intricate acoustics but if I want power and a bigger stage and better body all around I am plumping for the Ether C Flow.

dsc02547

Our Verdict

If you remember I said there is room in the den for both the Ether C and the C Flow right at the start of this review simply because I actually think the tonal change of the Flow C is evolutionary more than revolutionary. It offers something different and personally I think the new tonal flavor will appeal to a wider audience than before.

The Ether C was already a fantastic closed planar headphone in its own right and I still feel the urge to pick it up for certain genres. However, the C Flow gives me the power, particularly in the lower mids and midbass that puts some meat on the well-formed bones of the Ether C as well as smooth out that peaky treble response. It offers me more PRaT, a little bit more musicality and much less pain in system matching.

The impression of the C Flow is much more immediate and impactful than the Ether C in that respect. If I want to lay off on the power a little, go for something a little flatter and have the right match up I can still pick up the Ether C and feel pretty satisfied. Best of both worlds once again. MrSpeakers by continuing to sell the Ether C might actually agree on that point.

Is is still the best closed planar headphone in the business for my money but this time Dan has added a bit of more of the fun factor to make it one of the most immediately likable flagship closed headphones in the business. I am playing Asia on this all day brother whether you like or not!

Technical Specifications

 

  • Weight: 390g (13.8oz)
  • Frequency response: Yes*
  • Efficiency: 92dB/mW
  • Impedance: 23 ohms
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share

11 Responses

  1. Peter

    Any idea if the Ether C Flow pairs well with the Fiio M11? I’m wondering if that particular DAP would drive these headphones well.

    Reply
    • Marcus

      I would say it might be a bit underpowered for the C Flow and its tuning is not that strong on the low-end. The HiBy R5 or the Dethonray DTR1 would be more suited for demanding headphones at that price point.

      Reply
  2. Brian Kang

    I am currently running ether c flows through the chord hugo and was thinking of getting a portable amp to pair it with. Would adding the amps mentioned above to the hugo be a worthy investment?

    Reply
    • headfonics

      I think so given the Hugo amp has always been considered a bit thin sounding. Personally, I love the Bakoon HPA-01M current mode amp with planars, very meaty and resolving signature. You could, of course, sell the Hugo and get the Hugo 2 next month which has an improved amp section.

      Reply
  3. digitalFriday

    How do these compare to the Fostex Th900? I find the TH900 mids recessed and the highs too sparky (on some tracks). Difference in bass quantity / quality?

    Reply
  4. Rolin C

    Since getting my LCD-4’s in Dec last year, my SRH1540’s office headphone, and
    my SE846 on-the-go IEM’s have stopped being enjoyable.

    Are the MrSpeakers Ether C Flow headphones the best bet for my new office headphone? Or should I look at the Audeze LCD-XC?

    Leakage factor is super important to me, as well as sound quality and engagement.

    Sources that would be used is the GOv2 at the office and / or my Onkyo Granbeat DAPhone.

    Reply
    • headfonics

      The major factor is the weight for me and the tonal flavor. Both have excellent seal with those lambskin pads so it will come down purely to tonal difference if weight is not an issue as I think both have a fairly decent response in terms of how easy they are to drive.

      The Flow on the Ether C is more u-shaped than the older v.1.1. Its adds a huge amount of PRaT to the musicality of the Ether closed system design. If your office is one of those setups where you after a killer track or two to spice up your afternoon I would go with that.

      The XC is pretty darn good also and less u-shaped. It might have a degree more flexibility in genres for a closed headphone but I can;t confirm as it has been ages since I heard it.

      How is the power on the Granbeat by the way? Looks an interesting device.

      Reply
      • Rolin C

        Thanks for the feedback; greatly appreciated!
        Would you say the LCD-XC is closer sounding to the LCD-4’s (200ohm version)?
        I really enjoy the detail the LCD-4’s provides, and that glorious, detailed and textured bass & it’s pace.

        The SRH1540 are wonderful, but lacking the above.
        Which of the two would you recommend, in that light… or any other closed-back, full-sized, over-ear, headphone with minimal/no leakage?

        On the Granbeat: POWER is amazing!
        Link to my video of it driving my LCD-4’s, streaming from Tidal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBX8pYu9OAA

        Can also drive both my HD800S & HD650 headphones too.
        It’s not perfect.. but damn close… (perfect = the dual DAC’s should have been R2R DAC’s)

      • headfonics

        Honestly, I can’t tell you as I have not had more than 10 minutes with an LCD-4 to date. Hoping that will change eventually. For closed I would say Ether C Flow, or AKG K872. I heard the AEON from MrSpeaker also and though it was pretty competitive at just $700, might be worth demoing that if size is an issue.

        I have to get a GranBeat, been rocking the ZTE Axon 7 for 6 months as my smartphone with its AK4490EN chip and its good but lacks power.

      • Rolin C

        Thanks!
        I see the LCD-XC is not listen anywhere in your suggest closed back headphones of your 2nd comment.

        Unfortunately, the country I’m in (South Africa), almost no place has these headphones to audition… Even the 1 non-virtual store in the entire country can only do a special order for the K872.

        So reviews and comment section like this are my best bet.

        Perhaps a future review for those of us that want and need to listen at the office as well.. few closed back headies, with few popular sources.. and have leakage as a factor?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.