Select Comparisons

It’s a $1500 headphone and for that money you do have a few choices in the market though only one closed headphone in this category and that is the Audeze LCD-XC. The next nearest competitor to the Ether C? Well that’s the Alpha Prime and they do not make them anymore. The next stop down is the closed Oppo PM-3 and that is a pretty stiff drop and a whole different market thrust. Outside of that well if you are at a crossroads over whether to choose open or closed then you have a ton of flagships out there, both planar and dynamic ready to vie for your cash.

Audeze

I am still a fan of the LCD-2 Rev 2 and not of the post Fazor sound though there are plenty who will vouch for that particular revision. Personally I have the LCD-2 and the LCD-X and that suits me just fine with both having quite different tonal qualities. Compared to the Ether C the LCD-X is about the closest the Audeze range would get to a more neutral speedier sound that the Ether C has but even then there are some qualitative differences.

LCD-2 Rev 2 (Open)

The open back LCD-2 in all its iterations is of course the cheapest (not mentioning the EL8 here), the darkest, the heaviest hitter and probably the most treble shy of the lot. It has a ton of low end grunt, excellent texture and fantastic audible extension as well as being relatively easier to drive than the Ether C. I do love the meat on the bones the LCD-2 rev 2 can provide and when matched with a quality SS amp it sounds visceral and weighted.

3MusketeersB_1024

That shelved down treble on the LCD-2, most notably in the v1 edition, is a noted area of underperformance compared to the spritelier, articulate and tighter Ether C. I actually much prefer the soundstage and imaging of the Ether C to the LCD-2. It feels more engaging, more holographic and more precise. The treble extension on the Ether C certainly does help in that respect, making the LCD-2 sound darker in comparison.

LCD-XC (Closed)

Probably the match-up most likely to weigh on peoples’ minds as they are both closed flagship planars and in similar price categories. The XC sounds quite a bit darker than the more neutral and flatter Ether C which give bass heft and weight to the XC in return for a tighter speedier signature. The imaging and soundstage of the Ether C is more holographic with better top end extension and imaging than the smaller sounding and more upfront XC but again that audible bass extension belongs to the XC. Clarity and openness is very much in favor of the Ether C.

Title1

Final mention has to go to weight and that’s a pure win for the Ether C at 394g compared to the LCD-2 at 497g and the XC at a comparatively huge 650g. Yup the LCD-XC is a woody looker but it weighs a ton and switching back and forward between Audeze and Ether was like putting a cart yoke on and off my back. Seal though was excellent on all 3 headphones and the XC pads are very competitive indeed.

Fostex TH-900

Highly thought off closed planar in a similar price range as the Ether C. They are also extremely comfortable, almost on par with the Ether C and almost the same weight, weighing in at only 6gs more. The seal is not as good as the Ether C though and it does let in a bit more background noise in comparison so that might be something you want to factor into your thinking. The TH-900 bass response is far more impactful than the flatter more neutral Ether C but at the cost of a slightly recessed vocal stage that doesn’t sound as natural and detailed as the Ether C. Both have sparkle in the top end but the Ether C has better control and doesn’t feel as harsh, particularly when paired with tubes and using the felt/foam combinations. The Fostex is a bit easier to drive than the Ether C but having said that I wouldn’t feel comfortable using these for complex tracks and vocal centric work. The TH-900 is an impact can for me whereas the Ether C is more accurate and more resolving.

Beyer T5P (Closed)

Gosh it’s been awhile since I rolled these out of the closet and for good reason. The T5p has that shimmer that I simply cannot match enjoyably except for the ‘tubiest’ of sources and amps. It is very efficient mind you and you will have a lot more success driving the T5P from a wider range of portable sources than the 92db Ether C which does need amped. It is also very light and comfortable though without detachable cables. Isolation is a bit lower than the Ether C

Untitled-1

Courtesy of Beyerdynamic North America

Honestly though I never bought into the $1k portable tesla full sized headphone regardless of its articulation and detail. Too sharp by far. The Ether C, whilst no marauding black hole, does a better job on controlling the treble while still sounding very clear and articulate and has a more realistic set of vocal pipes than the Beyer T5P. When tuned it can also slam more convincingly. I have yet to try the latest version of the T5P but I bet you can’t upgrade it for $9.99.

Final Thoughts

The Ether C closed back planar headphone is an incredible experience and as of writing my absolute favorite closed back full size headphone bar none. It really is a testimony to Dan and his team at MrSpeakers that they have come from humble beginnings on tweaking old T50RP drivers to this absolute monster of a headphone with a set of drivers that MrSpeakers can entirely call their own. It is also a big pat on the back to MrSpeakers for a vision on how a headphone should sound. I saw glimpses of what Dan was after with the Dog and then more clearly with the Prime. The Ether C is basically that vision as full to life as possible. The dynamics and imaging on the Ether C are fantastic for a closed headphone; utterly engaging and totally involving. Everything flows from the get go and sounds very coherent.

Nothing in audio these days is a home run though and those coming in from Audeze or the HE1000 might want to note the bass response, tight and speedy as it is, can sound lean in comparison making EQ somewhat of an awkward bed fellow if you feel the stock v1.0 is still your favored overall tuning. Treble can peak a little higher with some system pairings, especially neutral SS amps and ESS DAC’s. EQ’s has good effect but be careful as things can quickly distort beyond 2-3db.

DSC01077

Tube users will find the sweet spot a lot quicker and the Ether C sounds excellent indeed with the CDM and the Studio 6 match up and for those on a budget it has to be the Mojo which was particularly convincing. Just remember those this is a closed headphone and I don’t think even MrSpeakers will lay claim to it besting flagship open cans. However, as a closed headphone I really prefer the Ether C tonality to the shimmering Beyer T5P and it also has a distinct edge in resolution and imaging wise over the Prime.

I admire how the team do not rest on their laurels either and the v1.1 is the sign of a brain constantly churning through possible permutations on how to make something this good even better. That DIY soul will never die and the fact I can have multiple variations on the sound from the Ether C from a set of $9.99 foam pads is the icing on the cake despite the relatively high initial outlay for the stock headphone. Whilst other companies are busy re-tuning at tremendous costs and those of us who want to try that re-tuning will have to shell out some big numbers, the Ether C can be retuned for half the price of a New York cinema ticket. Boutique companies can and should learn from MrSpeakers on this because not everyone can afford to buy revision after revision and it’s a sure fire way of building loyalty and enthusiasm.

Technical Specifications

  • Weight: 370g (13.1oz)
  • Frequency response: Yes*
  • Efficiency: 96dB/mW
  • Impedance: 23 ohms
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

4 Responses

  1. Pavol

    Hi team headphonics. Excuse me please for my questions. I know, this earphones is already old, also this rewiev, but maybe you can remember something from them. And also maybe you have also some experience with ATH-W5000, also old model. Please, do you can make some comparation for me, between them Ether C and ATH-W5000? What is beter or oposite of them? Thanks for your patience, understanding and kind answer to me. Have a good time…

    Reply
    • Marcus

      Hi Pavol, sadly I never had much time with the W5000, only in meets about 7 years ago. This is pure aural memory but the W5000I believe is lacking in bass compared to the Ether C, especially the Flow version which is far more impactful.

      Reply
      • Pavol

        Hi Marcus. Thanks…, i though, that you can´t remember exactly, what´s different between them. Strong bass is no exactly for i looking, even i have a read a lot, that ATH no have strong bass /i have ATH-AD900, and sometime i like little bit more bass, but realy just little bit by quantity, but definitely more by quality, impact, clarity/. My focus is on the sound stage, separation and clarity, musicality and balance, neutrality, enjoy long listening. I dream about sound like from normal speakers, but from closed earphones. Any way, thanks a lot for your answer….

      • Marcus

        Yeah Ether will give you a bit more bass from memory but I need to revisit the W5000 because it has been many years since I heard it. That seems to be the consensus among my peers though. Ether C is much more robust. Ether non-flow is quite neutral though and right now I am using an Ether open non-flow which I really like.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Final Score

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.