Sound impressions

Noise Floor

First things first: the M2X is almost free of hiss. It’s got a bit more amp noise than the DP-S1 or Plenue D2, but the differences between the three aren’t big. And, unlike the FiiO M6, which hisses, the M2X is heaps powerful. In fact, I measure it roughly 2dB shy of the benchmark set by the Plenue D2 and AK380 whilst connected to no load. Whilst driving load, it keeps stable power and therefore leads the AK380 by up to several decibels.

Like both the DP-S1 and Plenue D2, there aren’t many DAPs under a grand or two more powerful than the M2X. It has excellent control over both IEMs and headphones, will get your DT880/600s plenty loud. In other words, it has enough power to amply control and bring to bear bass and good control over highs to your 300Ω and 600Ω headphones. No, it won’t break your ears when driving those headphones, but it drives my DT880/600 to levels painful to my ears about as well as an AK380.

Through a Lynx HILO running the 24-bit RMAA suite, I measure -116,6dB noise, 116,5dB dynamic range, THD of 0,00069%, IMD + noise of 0,00208%, and -112,7dB of stereo separation. Those numbers better the Chord Mojo in a few areas, and when loaded, even better the AK380 in a few more areas. The M2X is impressive on the software bench.

At the ear, the M2X impresses almost as much as the Plenue D2. Compounded with its much easier and faster UI, I would choose the M2X every time because the small differences that my ears are even able to pick up (higher amp noise, fewer sound enhancements) are negligible compared to the ease of use.

Shanling M2x


The M2X is a pretty neutral sounding player. It is a bit less crunchy than the Plenue D2 and a bit crunchier than the Sony ZX300. Extension in both extremes is perfect at the bench, and neutrally bright at the ear.

It’s also generally free of grain. Whether you like this is up to you. I’ve really enjoyed mildly grainy, as well as dark, and bright DAPs. My favorite dark-sounding player is the original FiiO X3 and my favorite grainy player is the AP100. My favorite-sounding player between them is the Sony ZX300. The M2X can be set to sound pretty close to any of the above but it will never have the grain of the AP100, which can be both a blessing and a curse.


The M2X’s staging is neutral. Sure, it measures pretty wide, but in practice, its middling crunchy sound mixed with a bit of grain gives it a rich, nuanced midrange with great depth and some crossfeed. Since the ears hear in tandem, left and right channels filter across to the opposite ear. Crossfeed is natural. And while it’s only minor in the M2X, it is enough. Also, the M2X keeps channel stereo separation even between lows, mids, and highs.

Like the Plenue D2, the M2X lacks direct crossfeed settings. If you prefer channel bleed of 50% or more, you’ll really have to tweak out all the other settings with the M2X plugged into an ADC to watch how and where and when channels begin to bleed one into another.

Personally, I love channel bleeds of around 50% for a lot of music. But when that music goes electronic, and live, I love it to be much purer stereo, even through really stereo-sounding headphones.


The M2X features good direct DAC sound-shaping including sharp and slow rolls off, the latter of which I am a big fan. It also does short delay sharp, short delay short, and super slow roll-off, which I think really does the trick when you’ve got super sharp, peaky, or even sibilant earphones. All of these affect not only frequency response, but the staging, stereo width, and even Z-axis depth.

The M2X shows a respectable -112dB stereo separation in hi-gain with no filters engaged; better yet, even driving the Earsonics SM2, it keeps stereo signals to -86dB, which is within range of the Plenue D2, and among the best I’ve tested in the price range and above.

Also, the M2X keeps stereo detail even in the bass, mids, and highs, with a minor dip shown when driving low-impedance multi-armature earphones. The results aren’t world-class against the market as a whole, but they are close, certainly nipping on the heals of the Plenue D2 and even the AK380.

Shanling M2x


The short of all of that is that the M2X is pretty neutral voiced and therefore fits the sound signatures of a lot of earphones. Better, it has the power to confidently drive both low and high impedance headphones to high, current-rich volume levels. The only headphones that give it any trouble at all are really insensitive planar ones. But you knew that already.


There is a very slight amount of amp noise when paired with super sensitive earphones like the Hidizs MS1 and MS4, but it is minimal. As a result, it gets the Hiss King 90% seal of approval.


The M2X outputs power very close to the upper tier DAPs out there, powering past several of my desktop units, and approaching AK380 levels. Want more power than it from a portable source? You’ll have to look far and wide and likely pony up much more money.

Shanling M2x

Select Comparisons

While the Plenue D2 and Onkyo DP-S1 are slightly more powerful, the M2X sits in the upper rung in terms of power/noise ratios. The Sony ZX300 is darker sounding but hisses more. The DP-S1 is overall more neutral, but I’ve got to say, the slight crunch the M2X has over the DP-S1 is a matter of taste. The Plenue D2 has more crunch than the M2X, so these things grade on a scale. In terms of power, it goes 1-gen Sharp MD units/AK380/DP-S1/Plenue D2, M2X, ZX300, iPhone SE, FiiO M6, FiiO M3, Sony Minidisc.

Among the dap group, the ZX300 and M2X have the most polished UIs and best screens as well as the best speed. If UI quality doesn’t matter and only sound does, the M2X’s straddling point between soft grain and crunch is a great balance between the Sony sound and the Onkyo sound.

The M2X’s hardware button array is also easier to use than the DP-S1 and Plenue D2’s. The ZX300 again is ahead, but not by much.

Finally, because the M2X has pretty decent Bluetooth performance, it stands heads and shoulders above the Plenue D2, which hasn’t a wireless output of any sort, but falls next to the older Onkyo DP-S1 and certainly against the ZX300.

Shanling M2x

Our Verdict

The M2X is my first Shanling. It’s also one whose indelible experience may be a hurdle for future DAPs in the price range. It is designed so well, has such a nice screen, is easy to use, and it both measures and sounds good. It is Grade A in almost every metric I can think to throw at it, balanced by A+ and A- in a few areas.

I wish it had a crossfeed system. I wish its Bluetooth connection quality was better. But I’ve no problems with its sound or performance or utility in the hand. It sounds great and better yet, it works without UI or other feedback problems. That is far more than I can say for the DP-S1 and Plenue D2, which are plagued by screen, UI, and graphical issues.

Shanling M2X Specifications

  • Size: 90*60*16mm
  • Screen: 3.2inch, 320 x 480(resolution ratio)
  • Weight: about 147g
  • Support: 32bit/384kHz, DSD256
  • Gain compensation: high, low
  • Storage: external TF card, support 2TB capacity
  • D/A transform chip: AK4490EN
  • Power (adapter): DC5V,2A/Type-C USB connector
  • Bluetooth: 4.2 Version
  • Bluetooth code system: LDAC(2-way)/aptX( launch only)/AAC(2-way)

Single-ended output

  • Output power: [email protected]Ω/[email protected]
  • Frequency response: 20Hz-40kHz(-0.5dB)
  • SNR: 117dB(A-Weighting)
  • Output impedance: 1 Ω
  • Channel separation: 70dB(32Ω)
  • Dynamic range: 116dB
  • Distortion + noise: 0.0015%

Balanced output

  1. Output power: [email protected]Ω/[email protected]
  2. Frequency response: 20Hz-40kHz(-0.5dB)
  3. SNR: 117dB(A-Weighting)
  4. Output impedance: 2Ω
  5. Channel separation: 107dB
  6. Dynamic range: 116dB
  7. Distortion + noise: 0.0016%


  1. Standard: IEEE802.11b/g/n


  • 2400 mAh, fully charged in 2.5 hour
  • 10.5 hours in Single-ended output mode, 7.5 hours in Balanced output mode lasting
  • 176
  • 2

15 Responses

    • Marcus

      The HD600 is a high ohm headphone. It won’t sound bad on the M2X but honestly, it is going to sound much better with a decently powered desktop amplifier.

  1. Alberto

    Hi, I have fiio x3II and Cayin n3, the Cayin es better than fiio. So, if I prefer more detail and layering(3d) instead too much body(Cayin has too much), this is a good DAP for it?

    • Marcus

      It is possible, sadly, the reviewer who did this is no longer associated with us so I cannot say for sure.

  2. Jesús López Ortiz

    hola, buenos dias,

    Os compre via amazon un M2X, i no he sabido aclarar si éste puede ser conectado digitalmente al amplificador Yamaha 5.1 que ofrece dos entradas digitales, una Toslink i otra coaxial. Posee un DAC interno de 96Khz a 24 bits i entrada para decodificador de 6 canales En la especificaciones del M2X se indica que puede ser usado como transporte digital. Significa que puede ser conectado al amplificador por la salida del USB type C?.

    Gràcies per l’atenció!!

    -Esta salida es realmente digital?

    -Qué cable necesitaria para conectar el M2X a la entrada Toslink o a la digital
    coaxial del Yamaha?. Uno que convierta USB o USB type C a Coaxial digital (tipo
    RCA) o a Toslink?

    – Lo vendéis vosotros?

    • Marcus

      Hola. Intente encontrar una entrada auxiliar de 3.5 mm en su amplificador que acepte una entrada de línea. Luego puede usar la línea de salida en el M2x para audio.


      • Jesus

        Vamos a ver, el amplificador no tiene entrada 3,5mm de línea, solo tiene entradas analógicas rca para aux, dvd, cd I dos digitales como ya he dicho. Quiero que entre señal digital procedente del m2x (sí la tiene, que es lo que pregunto) si utilizo la salida de audio 3,5 del m2x, utilizo señal ANALÓGICA que, por ejemplo no podría soportar 5.1
        M2X tiene salida digital por el usb type C? gracias

      • Marcus

        No estoy seguro de entender, la señal digital seguirá siendo estéreo, no 5.1, ya que el M2X no decodifica 5.1. Sugeriría algo como un HDACC Essence para enviar una señal 5.1 al amplificador. De lo contrario, un cable RCA dual de 3.5 mm estará bien, ya que es una línea de salida.

  3. Loïc


    I’m about to change DAP (I had a FiiO X3 II) and started perusing on the web a bit. I was a bit surprised to see FiiO didn’t seem to keep on making X3 and X5, and disappointed when reading some comments in which people seemed not being satisfied with the FiiO products any longer. So, I had to change my initial plan (just buying again a FiiO X3). The Shanling seems to come back in different tops. My question would be, do you think that, as a former user of the FiiO X3 Second Generation, this one will be able to top it? Coz the latter was, for me, splendid…

  4. Dyan

    Great review. At this price point, how it compares to the Hiby R3 and the Xduoo X20?

  5. Marcos

    Hi, thanks for the review!

    At this price point, is there another dap with a more holographic sound and more headroom/Soundstage?

    I say that because I have a sennheiser hd600 and a tin hifi p1 (shipping yet), both which I know are very intimate phones, so I’d like to balance it out. By reading the reviews I’d say the Basso dx220 would be perfect for that, but any chance sth less expensive? =P


    • ohm

      You’ll have to describe the sort of DAP or source that to you means ‘holographic’ because I’ve found that with regards to stereo/soundstage, and that sort of thing, the experience varies greatly from person to person. Some find really confined stereo signals to be swimmingly wide and detailed, and others find the opposite. Name some devices you find to be holographic and maybe we can find a way to help.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.